As California's November 5th election draws near, voters face a critical decision that could reshape the state's rental housing and healthcare sectors. Two key measures, Proposition 33 and Proposition 34, are at the forefront of this debate, each with significant implications for property owners and renters alike.

Proposition 33: A Threat to Property Rights and Financial Stability

The consequences for property owners could be catastrophic. Non-partisan researchers from MIT have estimated that Proposition 33 could slash property values by up to 25%. For many landlords, this could mean losing the ability to maintain their properties, cover mortgage payments, or even avoid foreclosure. The financial burden would be especially severe for smaller landlords, potentially leading to bankruptcy and wiping out years of hard-earned investment.

Proposition 34: Safeguarding Healthcare Funds

Why Your Vote Matters

The stakes in this election are incredibly high. Proposition 33 threatens to undermine property rights, discourage new housing development, and worsen California's already severe housing shortage. Meanwhile, Proposition 34 offers a safeguard against the misuse of healthcare funds, ensuring that they are spent where they are needed most.

Tom Bannon, CEO of the California Apartment Association, warns that Proposition 33 poses an existential threat to California's rental housing industry. The time to act is now—your support is crucial to defeating this dangerous measure and protecting the future of housing in California.

Urgent Call to Action
Act Now to Protect Your Property Rights! Your financial support is crucial to defeating Proposition 33 and safeguarding California’s rental housing market.

Visit NoOnProp33.com and YesOnProp34.com to contribute today.